4.8 Article

Loss-of-function mutations of an inhibitory upstream ORF in the human hairless transcript cause Marie Unna hereditary hypotrichosis

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 228-233

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ng.276

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30730097, 30721063, 30771948]
  2. Ministry of Education, China
  3. Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association
  4. Pachyonychia Congenita Project
  5. British Skin Foundation
  6. National Eczema Society
  7. Medical Research Council [G0700314]
  8. Ministry of Education, China (SRFDP) [20050366004]
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Research Unit FOR) [423]
  10. Emmy Noether Programme
  11. Scientific Research Fund of the Australasian College of Dermatologists
  12. Scientific Research Fund of the Skin and Cancer Foundation of Victoria
  13. MRC [G0700314] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Medical Research Council [G0700314] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marie Unna hereditary hypotrichosis (MUHH) is an autosomal dominant form of genetic hair loss. In a large Chinese family carrying MUHH, we identified a pathogenic initiation codon mutation in U2HR, an inhibitory upstream ORF in the 5' UTR of the gene encoding the human hairless homolog (HR). U2HR is predicted to encode a 34-amino acid peptide that is highly conserved among mammals. In 18 more families from different ancestral groups, we identified a range of defects in U2HR, including loss of initiation, delayed termination codon and nonsense and missense mutations. Functional analysis showed that these classes of mutations all resulted in increased translation of the main HR physiological ORF. Our results establish the link between MUHH and U2HR, show that fine-tuning of HR protein levels is important in control of hair growth, and identify a potential mechanism for preventing hair loss or promoting hair removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available