4.8 Article

Hydrolytic stability in hemilabile metal-organic frameworks

Journal

NATURE CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 1096-1102

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-018-0104-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. EPSRC [EP/L014475/1, EP/K025112/1]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [P106/12/G015]
  4. OP VVV 'Excellent Research Teams' [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000417 - CUCAM]
  5. Royal Society/Wolfson Foundation
  6. European Research Council (EU FP7 Consolidator Grant) [614290 'EXONMR']
  7. US DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. US DOE [DE-SC0001015]
  9. EPSRC Capital for Great Technologies funding [EP/L017008/1]
  10. EPSRC [EP/L017008/1, 1690651] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which have undergone exciting developments over the past few decades, show promise for a wide range of applications. However, many studies indicate that they suffer from significant stability issues, especially with respect to their interactions with water, which severely limits their practical potential. Here we demonstrate how the presence of 'sacrificial' bonds in the coordination environment of its metal centres (referred to as hemilability) endows a dehydrated copper-based MOF with good hydrolytic stability. On exposure to water, in contrast to the indiscriminate breaking of coordination bonds that typically results in structure degradation, it is non-structural weak interactions between the MOF's copper paddlewheel clusters that are broken and the framework recovers its as-synthesized, hydrated structure. This MOF retained its structural integrity even after contact with water for one year, whereas HKUST-1, a compositionally similar material that lacks these sacrificial bonds, loses its crystallinity in less than a day under the same conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available