4.8 Article

Structural complexity through multicomponent cycloaddition cascades enabled by dual-purpose, reactivity regenerating 1,2,3-triene equivalents

Journal

NATURE CHEMISTRY
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 448-452

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.1917

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE1265956]
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA031841]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Abbott Laboratories Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  5. Kanazawa University
  6. German Academic Exchange Service
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1265956] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26460004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicomponent reactions allow for more bond-forming events per synthetic operation, enabling more step-and time-economical conversion of simple starting materials to complex and thus value-added targets. These processes invariably require that reactivity be relayed from intermediate to intermediate over several mechanistic steps until a termination event produces the final product. Here, we report a multicomponent process in which a novel 1,2,3-butatriene equivalent (TMSBO: TMSCH2C CCH2OH) engages chemospecifically as a two-carbon alkyne component in a metal-catalysed [5+2] cycloaddition with a vinylcyclopropane to produce an intermediate cycloadduct. Under the reaction conditions, this intermediate undergoes a remarkably rapid 1,4-Peterson elimination, producing a reactive four-carbon diene intermediate that is readily intercepted in either a metal-catalysed or thermal [4+2] cycloaddition. TMSBO thus serves as an yne-to-diene transmissive reagent coupling two powerful and convergent cycloadditions-the homologous Diels-Alder and Diels-Alder cycloadditions-through a vinylogous Peterson elimination, and enabling flexible access to diverse polycycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available