4.8 Article

Small-molecule-induced DNA damage identifies alternative DNA structures in human genes

Journal

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 301-310

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEMBIO.780

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [086861/Z/08/Z]
  2. Cancer Research UK (CRUK) [C6/A11224, C9681/A11961]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G008337/1]
  4. EMBO (ALTF) [93-2010]
  5. European Research Council
  6. European Community
  7. Wellcome Trust
  8. University of Cambridge
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G008337/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Cancer Research UK [11224, 11961] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. BBSRC [BB/G008337/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guanine-rich DNA sequences that can adopt non-Watson-Crick structures in vitro are prevalent in the human genome. Whether such structures normally exist in mammalian cells has, however, been the subject of active research for decades. Here we show that the G-quadruplex-interacting drug pyridostatin promotes growth arrest in human cancer cells by inducing replication-and transcription-dependent DNA damage. A chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis of the DNA damage marker gamma H2AX provided the genome-wide distribution of pyridostatin-induced sites of damage and revealed that pyridostatin targets gene bodies containing clusters of sequences with a propensity for G-quadruplex formation. As a result, pyridostatin modulated the expression of these genes, including the proto-oncogene SRC. We observed that pyridostatin reduced SRC protein abundance and SRC-dependent cellular motility in human breast cancer cells, validating SRC as a target of this drug. Our unbiased approach to define genomic sites of action for a drug establishes a framework for discovering functional DNA-drug interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available