4.8 Article

Rationally designed families of orthogonal RNA regulators of translation

Journal

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 447-454

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEMBIO.919

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. British Petroleum at the Joint BioEnergy Institute [LB08004883]
  2. Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center under US National Science Foundation [04-570/0540879]
  3. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/47819/2008]
  4. Miller Institute for Basic Scientific Research
  5. Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/47819/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our ability to routinely engineer genetic networks for applications is limited by the scarcity of highly specific and non-crossreacting (orthogonal) gene regulators with predictable behavior. Though antisense RNAs are attractive contenders for this purpose, quantitative understanding of their specificity and sequence-function relationship sufficient for their design has been limited. Here, we use rationally designed variants of the RNA-IN-RNA-OUT antisense RNA-mediated translation system from the insertion sequence IS10 to quantify >500 RNA-RNA interactions in Escherichia coli and integrate the data set with sequence-activity modeling to identify the thermodynamic stability of the duplex and the seed region as the key determinants of specificity. Applying this model, we predict the performance of an additional similar to 2,600 antisense-regulator pairs, forecast the possibility of large families of orthogonal mutants, and forward engineer and experimentally validate two RNA pairs orthogonal to an existing group of five from the training data set. We discuss the potential use of these regulators in next-generation synthetic biology applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available