4.8 Article

In vitro bacterial polysaccharide biosynthesis: defining the functions of Wzy and Wzz

Journal

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 418-423

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.351

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH Predoctoral Trainee Program [T32 GM008512]
  2. China Scholarship Council [2007102057]
  3. US National Cancer Institute [R01 CA118208]
  4. US National Institutes of Health [R01 GM085267]
  5. US National Science Foundation [CHE-0616892]
  6. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [51946]
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA118208] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM008512, R01GM085267] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polysaccharides constitute a major component of bacterial cell surfaces and play critical roles in bacteria-host interactions. The biosynthesis of such molecules, however, has mainly been characterized through in vivo genetic studies, thus precluding discernment of the details of this pathway. Accordingly, we present a chemical approach that enabled reconstitution of the E. coli O-polysaccharide biosynthetic pathway in vitro. Starting with chemically prepared undecaprenyl-diphospho-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, the E. coli O86 oligosaccharide repeating unit was assembled by means of sequential enzymatic glycosylation. Successful expression of the putative polymerase Wzy using a chaperone coexpression system then allowed demonstration of polymerization in vitro using this substrate. Analysis of more substrates revealed a defined mode of recognition for Wzy toward the lipid moiety. Specific polysaccharide chain length modality was furthermore demonstrated to result from the action of Wzz. Collectively, polysaccharide biosynthesis was chemically reconstituted in vitro, providing a well defined system for further underpinning molecular details of this biosynthetic pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available