4.8 Article

A membrane trafficking pathway regulated by the plant-specific RAB GTPase ARA6

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 853-U279

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2270

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. [195010]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20001009, 10J08869, 11J08803, 21248002, 21370016, 22570051, 23012010] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endosomal trafficking plays an integral role in various eukaryotic cell activities and serves as a basis for higher-order functions in multicellular organisms. An understanding of the importance of endosomal trafficking in plants is rapidly developing(1,2), but its molecular mechanism is mostly unknown. Several key regulators of endosomal trafficking, including RAB5, which regulates diverse endocytic events in animal cells(3,4), are highly conserved. However, the identification of lineage-specific regulators in eukaryotes indicates that endosomal trafficking is diversified according to distinct body plans and life styles. In addition to orthologues of metazoan RAB5, landplants possess a unique RAB5 molecule, which is one of the most prominent features of plant RAB GTPase organization(5,6). Plants have also evolved a unique repertoire of SNAREs, the most distinctive of which are diverse VAMP7-related longins, including plant-unique VAMP72 derivatives(7). Here, we demonstrate that a plant-unique RAB5 protein, ARA6, acts in an endosomal trafficking pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. ARA6 modulates the assembly of a distinct SNARE complex from conventional RAB5, and has a functional role in the salinity stress response. Our results indicate that plants possess a unique endosomal trafficking network and provide the first indication of a functional link between a specific RAB and a specific SNARE complex in plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available