4.8 Article

Evaluation of 244,000 synthetic sequences reveals design principles to optimize translation in Escherichia coli

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 1005-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4238

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Human Frontier Science Program [LT000873/2011-l]
  2. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/47819/2008]
  3. Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (SynBERC under National Science Foundation grant) [04-570/0540879]
  4. NIH [S10RR029668, S10RR027303]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/47819/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparative analyses of natural and mutated sequences have been used to probe mechanisms of gene expression, but small sample sizes may produce biased outcomes. We applied an unbiased design-of-experiments approach to disentangle factors suspected to affect translation efficiency in E.coli. We precisely designed 244,000 DNA sequences implementing 56 replicates of a full factorial design to evaluate nucleotide, secondary structure, codon and amino acid properties in combination. For each sequence, we measured reporter transcript abundance and decay, polysome profiles, protein production and growth rates. Associations between designed sequences properties and these consequent phenotypes were dominated by secondary structures and their interactions within transcripts. We confirmed that transcript structure generally limits translation initiation and demonstrated its physiological cost using an epigenetic assay. Codon composition has a sizable impact on translatability, but only in comparatively rare elongation-limited transcripts. We propose a set of design principles to improve translation efficiency that would benefit from more accurate prediction of secondary structures in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available