4.8 Article

Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 656-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2906

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Institute of Genomics for Citrus Breeding, Brazil [FAPESP 08/57909-2, CNPq 573848/08-4]
  2. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)
  3. Embrapa-Monsanto Agreement
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [CITRUSSEQ PCS-08-GENO]
  5. program ANR Blanc-PAGE [ANR-2011-BSV6-00801]
  6. US National Institutes of Health [HG00783]
  7. Generalitat Valenciana, Spain [PrometeoII/2013/008]
  8. Ministry of Economy and Innovation-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), Spain [AGL2011-26490]
  9. Conselleria de Agricultura, Pesca, Alimentacion y Agua from the Generalitat Valenciana
  10. Ministerio de Economia e Innovacion [PSE-060000-2009-8, IPT-010000-2010-43]
  11. Citruseq-Citrusgenn consortium company (Anecoop S. Coop., Eurosemillas S.A.)
  12. Citruseq-Citrusgenn consortium company (Fundacion Ruralcaja Valencia)
  13. Citruseq-Citrusgenn consortium company (GCM Variedades Vegetales A.I.E.)
  14. Citruseq-Citrusgenn consortium company ( Investigacion Citricola Castellon S.A.)
  15. Citruseq-Citrusgenn consortium company (Source Citrus Genesis-Special New Fruit Licensing, Ltd.)
  16. Florida Citrus Production Research Advisory Council (FCPRAC)
  17. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services [013646]
  18. Florida Department of Citrus (FDOC)
  19. Citrus Research and Development Foundation [71]
  20. Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali, Project Citrustart
  21. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR), Programma Operativo Nazionale 'Ricerca e Competitivita', Project IT-Citrus Genomics [PON_01623]
  22. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cultivated citrus are selections from, or hybrids of, wild progenitor species whose identities and contributions to citrus domestication remain controversial. Here we sequence and compare citrus genomes-a high-quality reference haploid clementine genome and mandarin, pummelo, sweet-orange and sour-orange genomes- and show that cultivated types derive from two progenitor species. Although cultivated pummelos represent selections from one progenitor species, Citrus maxima, cultivated mandarins are introgressions of C. maxima into the ancestral mandarin species Citrus reticulata. The most widely cultivated citrus, sweet orange, is the offspring of previously admixed individuals, but sour orange is an F1 hybrid of pure C. maxima and C. reticulata parents, thus implying that wild mandarins were part of the early breeding germplasm. A Chinese wild 'mandarin' diverges substantially from C. reticulata, thus suggesting the possibility of other unrecognized wild citrus species. Understanding citrus phylogeny through genome analysis clarifies taxonomic relationships and facilitates sequence-directed genetic improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available