4.8 Article

Network link prediction by global silencing of indirect correlations

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 720-725

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2601

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Center of Excellence of Genomic Science (CEGS) [NIH CEGS 1P50HG4233]
  2. NIH [1U01HL108630-01]
  3. DARPA [11645021]
  4. DARPA Social Media in Strategic Communications project [W911NF-12-C-0028]
  5. Network Science Collaborative Technology Alliance
  6. US Army Research Laboratory [NS-CTA W911NF-09-02-0053]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N000141010968]
  8. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [WMD BRBAA07-J-2-0035, BRBAA08-Per4-C-2-0033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictions of physical and functional links between cellular components are often based on correlations between experimental measurements, such as gene expression. However, correlations are affected by both direct and indirect paths, confounding our ability to identify true pairwise interactions. Here we exploit the fundamental properties of dynamical correlations in networks to develop a method to silence indirect effects. The method receives as input the observed correlations between node pairs and uses a matrix transformation to turn the correlation matrix into a highly discriminative silenced matrix, which enhances only the terms associated with direct causal links. Against empirical data for Escherichia coli regulatory interactions, the method enhanced the discriminative power of the correlations by twofold, yielding >50% predictive improvement over traditional correlation measures and 6% over mutual information. Overall this silencing method will help translate the abundant correlation data into insights about a system's interactions, with applications ranging from link prediction to inferring the dynamical mechanisms governing biological networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available