4.8 Article

Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 777-782

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2282

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marie Mayer Foundation
  2. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K12HD001259]
  3. NIH [R33MH87925]
  4. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [CL1-00502, RT1-01108, TR1-01250, RN2-00931]
  5. European Research Council [243066]
  6. Swedish Research Council [2008-4562]
  7. Foundation for Strategic Research [FFL4]
  8. Ake Wiberg Foundation [756194131]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [243066] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide transcriptome analyses are routinely used to monitor tissue-, disease- and cell type specific gene expression, but it has been technically challenging to generate expression profiles from single cells. Here we describe a robust mRNA-Seq protocol (Smart-Seq) that is applicable down to single cell levels. Compared with existing methods, Smart-Seq has improved read coverage across transcripts, which enhances detailed analyses of alternative transcript isoforms and identification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We determined the sensitivity and quantitative accuracy of Smart-Seq for single-cell transcriptomics by evaluating it on total RNA dilution series. We found that although gene expression estimates from single cells have increased noise, hundreds of differentially expressed genes could be identified using few cells per cell type. Applying Smart-Seq to circulating tumor cells from melanomas, we identified distinct gene expression patterns, including candidate biomarkers for melanoma circulating tumor cells. Our protocol will be useful for addressing fundamental biological problems requiring genome-wide transcriptome profiling in rare cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available