4.8 Article

Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 555-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2196

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER64636]
  3. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2008-35504-04851]
  4. National Science Foundation [IOS-0701736, DBI-0607123]
  5. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology [PSB08-007, PS11-035B]
  6. University of Missouri Research Board
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1118550] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology [1441393] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1118550] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We generated a high-quality reference genome sequence for foxtail millet (Setaria italica). The similar to 400-Mb assembly covers similar to 80% of the genome and > 95% of the gene space. The assembly was anchored to a 992-locus genetic map and was annotated by comparison with > 1.3 million expressed sequence tag reads. We produced more than 580 million RNA-Seq reads to facilitate expression analyses. We also sequenced Setaria viridis, the ancestral wild relative of S. italica, and identified regions of differential single-nucleotide polymorphism density, distribution of transposable elements, small RNA content, chromosomal rearrangement and segregation distortion. The genus Setaria includes natural and cultivated species that demonstrate a wide capacity for adaptation. The genetic basis of this adaptation was investigated by comparing five sequenced grass genomes. We also used the diploid Setaria genome to evaluate the ongoing genome assembly of a related polyploid, switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available