4.8 Article

Kidney injury molecule-1 outperforms traditional biomarkers of kidney injury in preclinical biomarker qualification studies

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 478-U135

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1623

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [ES016723, DK39773, DK72831, DK74099]
  2. Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) [G34511M, CO1-40182A-1]
  3. National University of Mexico [DGAPA IN208602-3]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R33DK074099, R21DK074099, R37DK039773, R01DK039773, R01DK072381] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R00ES016723, K99ES016723] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kidney toxicity accounts both for the failure of many drug candidates as well as considerable patient morbidity. Whereas histopathology remains the gold standard for nephrotoxicity in animal systems, serum creatinine (SCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) are the primary options for monitoring kidney dysfunction in humans. The transmembrane tubular protein kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1) was previously reported to be markedly induced in response to renal injury. Owing to the poor sensitivity and specificity of SCr and BUN, we used rat toxicology studies to compare the diagnostic performance of urinary Kim-1 to BUN, SCr and urinary N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG) as predictors of kidney tubular damage scored by histopathology. Kim-1 outperforms SCr, BUN and urinary NAG in multiple rat models of kidney injury. Urinary Kim-1 measurements may facilitate sensitive, specific and accurate prediction of human nephrotoxicity in preclinical drug screens. This should enable early identification and elimination of compounds that are potentially nephrotoxic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available