4.8 Article

The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 541-547

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1360

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BBSRC [BB/E025080/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. MRC [G8225539] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. NERC [pml010004] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0946528] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E025080/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G8225539] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [CEH010021, pml010004, NE/D521773/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E025080/1] Funding Source: Medline
  10. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 LM999999] Funding Source: Medline
  11. Medical Research Council [G8225539] Funding Source: Medline
  12. NHGRI NIH HHS [U54 HG004028] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the quantity of genomic data increasing at an exponential rate, it is imperative that these data be captured electronically, in a standard format. Standardization activities must proceed within the auspices of open-access and international working bodies. To tackle the issues surrounding the development of better descriptions of genomic investigations, we have formed the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC). Here, we introduce the minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification with the intent of promoting participation in its development and discussing the resources that will be required to develop improved mechanisms of metadata capture and exchange. As part of its wider goals, the GSC also supports improving the 'transparency' of the information contained in existing genomic databases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available