4.8 Article

The onset of star formation 250 million years after the Big Bang

Journal

NATURE
Volume 557, Issue 7705, Pages 392-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0117-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NAOJ ALMA Scientific Research [2016-01 A]
  2. European Research Council Advanced [FP7/669253, 339177]
  3. KAKENHI [26287034, 17H01114, 17H06130, 17H04831, 16H01085, 16H02166, 15K17616, 17K14252, JP17H01111, 16J03329, 15H02064]
  4. grant CONICYT-Chile Basal-CATA [PFB-06/2007]
  5. FONDECYT Regular [1141218]
  6. NAOJ Visiting Fellow Program
  7. NASA
  8. Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01085, 15H02064, 16J03329] Funding Source: KAKEN
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [339177] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fundamental quest of modern astronomy is to locate the earliest galaxies and study how they influenced the intergalactic medium a few hundred million years after the Big Bang(1-3). The abundance of star-forming galaxies is known to decline(4,5) from redshifts of about 6 to 10, but a key question is the extent of star formation at even earlier times, corresponding to the period when the first galaxies might have emerged. Here we report spectroscopic observations of MACS1149-JD1(6), a gravitationally lensed galaxy observed when the Universe was less than four per cent of its present age. We detect an emission line of doubly ionized oxygen at a redshift of 9.1096 +/- 0.0006, with an uncertainty of one standard deviation. This precisely determined redshift indicates that the red rest-frame optical colour arises from a dominant stellar component that formed about 250 million years after the Big Bang, corresponding to a redshift of about 15. Our results indicate that it may be possible to detect such early episodes of star formation in similar galaxies with future telescopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available