4.8 Article

Sea-level and deep-sea-temperature variability over the past 5.3 million years

Journal

NATURE
Volume 508, Issue 7497, Pages 477-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13230

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Laureate Fellowship [FL120100050]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) consortium project iGlass
  3. Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London
  4. NERC [NE/I008365/1, bosc01001, NE/I009906/1, NE/H006273/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [bosc01001, NE/I008365/1, noc010012, NE/I009906/1, NE/H006273/1, 1233832] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ice volume (and hence sea level) and deep-sea temperature are key measures of global climate change. Sea level has been documented using several independent methods over the past 0.5 million years (Myr). Older periods, however, lack such independent validation; all existing records are related to deep-sea oxygen isotope (delta O-18) data that are influenced by processes unrelated to sea level. For deep-sea temperature, only one continuous high-resolution (Mg/Ca-based) record exists, with related sea-level estimates, spanning the past 1.5 Myr. Here we present a novel sea-level reconstruction, with associated estimates of deep-sea temperature, which independently validates the previous 0-1.5 Myr reconstruction and extends it back to 5.3 Myr ago. We find that deep-sea temperature and sea level generally decreased through time, but distinctly out of synchrony, which is remarkable given the importance of ice-albedo feedbacks on the radiative forcing of climate. In particular, we observe a large temporal offset during the onset of Plio-Pleistocene ice ages, between a marked cooling step at 2.73 Myr ago and the first major glaciation at 2.15 Myr ago. Last, we tentatively infer that ice sheets may have grown largest during glacials with more modest reductions in deep-sea temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available