4.8 Article

Prevalence of viscoelastic relaxation after the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake

Journal

NATURE
Volume 514, Issue 7520, Pages 84-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13778

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Geological Survey of Canada
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through University of Victoria
  3. University of Victoria
  4. Howard E. Petch Scholarship
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan under Earthquake and Volcano Hazards Observation and Research Program
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23253003, 26000002, 26109007] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After a large subduction earthquake, crustal deformation continues to occur, with a complex pattern of evolution(1). This postseismic deformation is due primarily to viscoelastic relaxation of stresses induced by the earthquake rupture and continuing slip (afterslip) or relocking of different parts of the fault(2-6). When postseismic geodetic observations are used to study Earth's rheology and fault behaviour, it is commonly assumed that short-term (a few years) deformation near the rupture zone is caused mainly by afterslip, and that viscoelasticity is important only for longer-term deformation(6,7). However, it is difficult to test the validity of this assumption against conventional geodetic data. Here we show that new seafloor GPS(Global Positioning System) observations immediately after the great Tohoku-oki earthquake provide unambiguous evidence for the dominant role of viscoelastic relaxation in short-term postseismic deformation. These data reveal fast landward motion of the trench area, opposing the seaward motion of GPS siteson land. Using numerical models of transient viscoelastic mantle rheology, we demonstrate that the landward motion is a consequence of relaxation of stresses induced by the asymmetric rupture of the thrust earthquake, a process previously unknown because of the lack of near-field observations. Our findings indicate that previous models assuming an elastic Earth will have substantially overestimated afterslip downdip of the rupture zone, and underestimated afterslip updip of the rupture zone; our knowledge of fault friction based on these estimates therefore needs to be revised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available