4.8 Article

RNA G-quadruplexes cause eIF4A-dependent oncogene translation in cancer

Journal

NATURE
Volume 513, Issue 7516, Pages 65-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13485

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01-CA142798-01]
  2. Leukemia Research Foundation
  3. Experimental Therapeutics Center
  4. American Cancer Society [10284, PF-11-077-01-CDD]
  5. European Union [PITN-GA-2012-316861]
  6. Fund for Scientific Research FWO Flanders [G.0198.08, G.0869.10N]
  7. GOA-UGent [12051203]
  8. Stichting tegen Kanker
  9. Belgian Program of Interuniversity Poles of Attraction
  10. Belgian Foundation Against Cancer
  11. Lymphoma Research Foundation
  12. National Institutes of Health [GM-067041, GM-073855]
  13. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-10653]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The translational control of oncoprotein expression is implicated in many cancers. Here we report an eIF4A RNA helicase-dependent mechanism of translational control that contributes to oncogenesis and underlies the anticancer effects of silvestrol and related compounds. For example, eIF4A promotes T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia development in vivo and is required for leukaemia maintenance. Accordingly, inhibition of eIF4A with silvestrol has powerful therapeutic effects against murine and human leukaemic cells in vitro and in vivo. We use transcriptome-scale ribosome footprinting to identify the hallmarks of eIF4A-dependent transcripts. These include 5' untranslated region (UTR) sequences such as the 12-nucleotide guanine quartet (CGG)(4) motif that can form RNA G-quadruplex structures. Notably, among the most eIF4A-dependent and silvestrol-sensitive transcripts are a number of oncogenes, superenhancer-associated transcription factors, and epigenetic regulators. Hence, the 5' UTRs of select cancer genes harbour a targetable requirement for the eIF4A RNA helicase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available