4.8 Article

A mass of less than 15 solar masses for the black hole in an ultraluminous X-ray source

Journal

NATURE
Volume 514, Issue 7521, Pages 198-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13730

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP120102393]
  2. CNES (CNRS/INSU/CNES) [92532]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [AYA 2010-18080]
  4. Ideas Plus programme of the Polish Ministry of Science
  5. ESO telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [084.D-0881, 087.D-0602]
  6. ESA member states
  7. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most ultraluminous X-ray sources(1) have a typical set of properties not seen in Galactic stellar-mass black holes. They have luminosities of more than 3 x 10(39) ergs per second, unusually soft X-ray components (with a typical temperature of less than about 0.3 kiloelectronvolts) and a characteristic downturn(2,3) in their spectra above about 5 kiloelectronvolts. Such puzzling properties have been interpreted either as evidence of intermediate-mass black holes(4,5) or as emission from stellar-mass black holes accreting above their Eddington limit(6,7), analogous to some Galactic black holes at peak luminosity(8,9). Recently, a very soft X-ray spectrum was observed in a rare and transient stellar-mass black hole(10). Here we report that the X-ray source P13 in the galaxy NGC 7793(11) is in a binary system with a period of about 64 days and exhibits all three canonical properties of ultraluminous sources. By modelling the strong optical and ultraviolet modulations arising from X-ray heating of the B9Ia donor star, we constrain the black hole mass to be less than 15 solar masses. Our results demonstrate that in P13, soft thermal emission and spectral curvature are indeed signatures of supercritical accretion. By analogy, ultraluminous X-ray sources with similar X-ray spectra and luminosities of up to a few times 10(40) ergs per second can be explained by supercritical accretion onto massive stellar-mass black holes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available