4.8 Article

Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation

Journal

NATURE
Volume 508, Issue 7497, Pages 517-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13144

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF Research Coordination Network [NSF-DEB-1042132]
  2. NSF Long Term Ecological Research program [NSF-DEB-1234162]
  3. UMN Institute on the Environment [DG-0001-13]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [0823380] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1440484, 1042132] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human alterations to nutrient cycles(1,2) and herbivore communities(3-7) are affecting global biodiversity dramatically(2). Ecological theory predicts these changes should be strongly counteractive: nutrient addition drives plant species loss through intensified competition for light, whereas herbivores prevent competitive exclusion by increasing ground-level light, particularly in productive systems(8,9). Here we use experimental data spanning a globally relevant range of conditions to test the hypothesis that herbaceous plant species losses caused by eutrophication may be offset by increased light availability due to herbivory. This experiment, replicated in 40 grasslands on 6 continents, demonstrates that nutrients and herbivores can serve as counteracting forces to control local plant diversity through light limitation, independent of site productivity, soil nitrogen, herbivore type and climate. Nutrient addition consistently reduced local diversity through light limitation, and herbivory rescued diversity at sites where it alleviated light limitation. Thus, species loss from anthropogenic eutrophication can be ameliorated in grasslands where herbivory increases ground-level light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available