4.8 Article

Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly

Journal

NATURE
Volume 501, Issue 7467, Pages 373-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12517

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT098051]
  2. Austrian Academy of Sciences
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Z153-B09, I552-B19]
  4. ERC
  5. EMBO
  6. Helen Hay Whitney
  7. Medical Research Council
  8. European Research Council (ERC)
  9. Lister Institute for Preventative Medicine
  10. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Z153] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  11. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Z 153] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127580972] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. MRC [MC_PC_U127580972] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complexity of the human brain has made it difficult to study many brain disorders in model organisms, highlighting the need for an in vitro model of human brain development. Here we have developed a human pluripotent stem cell-derived three-dimensional organoid culture system, termed cerebral organoids, that develop various discrete, although interdependent, brain regions. These include a cerebral cortex containing progenitor populations that organize and produce mature cortical neuron subtypes. Furthermore, cerebral organoids are shown to recapitulate features of human cortical development, namely characteristic progenitor zone organization with abundant outer radial glial stem cells. Finally, we use RNA interference and patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells to model microcephaly, a disorder that has been difficult to recapitulate in mice. We demonstrate premature neuronal differentiation in patient organoids, a defect that could help to explain the disease phenotype. Together, these data show that three-dimensional organoids can recapitulate development and disease even in this most complex human tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available