4.8 Article

An old disk still capable of forming a planetary system

Journal

NATURE
Volume 493, Issue 7434, Pages 644-646

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11805

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA through JPL/Caltech
  2. US National Science Foundation [1008800]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109857, 1008800] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From the masses of the planets orbiting the Sun, and the abundance of elements relative to hydrogen, it is estimated that when the Solar System formed, the circumstellar disk must have had a minimum mass of around 0.01 solar masses within about 100 astronomical units of the star(1-4). (One astronomical unit is the EarthSun distance.) The main constituent of the disk, gaseous molecular hydrogen, does not efficiently emit radiation from the disk mass reservoir(5), and so the most common measure of the disk mass is dust thermal emission and lines of gaseous carbon monoxide(6). Carbon monoxide emission generally indicates properties of the disk surface, and the conversion from dust emission to gas mass requires knowledge of the grain properties and the gas-to-dust mass ratio, which probably differ from their interstellar values(7,8). As a result, mass estimates vary by orders of magnitude, as exemplified by the relatively old (3-10 million years) star TW Hydrae(9,10), for which the range is 0.0005-0.06 solar masses(11-14). Here we report the detection of the fundamental rotational transition of hydrogen deuteride from the direction of TW Hydrae. Hydrogen deuteride is a good tracer of disk gas because it follows the distribution of molecular hydrogen and its emission is sensitive to the total mass. The detection of hydrogen deuteride, combined with existing observations and detailed models, implies a disk mass of more than 0.05 solar masses, which is enough to form a planetary system like our own.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available