4.8 Article

Classical command of quantum systems

Journal

NATURE
Volume 496, Issue 7446, Pages 456-460

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. ARO-DTO
  3. Mitacs
  4. US NSF [CCF-0905626]
  5. Templeton grant [21674]
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0905626] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [0905626] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations
  9. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1254119] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum computation and cryptography both involve scenarios in which a user interacts with an imperfectly modelled or 'untrusted' system. It is therefore of fundamental and practical interest to devise tests that reveal whether the system is behaving as instructed. In 1969, Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt proposed an experimental test that can be passed by a quantum-mechanical system but not by a system restricted to classical physics. Here we extend this test to enable the characterization of a large quantum system. We describe a scheme that can be used to determine the initial state and to classically command the system to evolve according to desired dynamics. The bipartite system is treated as two black boxes, with no assumptions about their inner workings except that they obey quantum physics. The scheme works even if the system is explicitly designed to undermine it; any misbehaviour is detected. Among its applications, our scheme makes it possible to test whether a claimed quantum computer is truly quantum. It also advances towards a goal of quantum cryptography: namely, the use of 'untrusted' devices to establish a shared random key, with security based on the validity of quantum physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available