4.8 Article

Cytokinin signalling inhibitory fields provide robustness to phyllotaxis

Journal

NATURE
Volume 505, Issue 7483, Pages 417-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12791

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Human Frontier Science Program Organization [HFSPO CDA 0047/2007]
  2. Agence National de la Recherche [ANR-07-JCJC-0115]
  3. AuxiFlo [ANR-12-BSV6-0005]
  4. transnational EraSysBio Grant (iSAM)
  5. French Ministry of Research
  6. CJS grant from INRA
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-07-JCJC-0115] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How biological systems generate reproducible patterns with high precision is a central question in science(1). The shoot apical meristem (SAM), a specialized tissue producing plant aerial organs, is a developmental system of choice to address this question. Organs are periodically initiated at the SAM at specific spatial positions and this spatiotemporal pattern defines phyllotaxis. Accumulation of the plant hormone auxin triggers organ initiation(2-5), whereas auxin depletion around organs generates inhibitory fields that are thought to be sufficient to maintain these patterns and their dynamics(4,6-13). Here we show that another type of hormone-based inhibitory fields, generated directly downstream of auxin by intercellular movement of the cytokinin signalling inhibitor ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE PHOSPHOTRANSFER PROTEIN 6 (AHP6)(14), is involved in regulating phyllotactic patterns. We demonstrate that AHP6-based fields establish patterns of cytokinin signalling in the meristem that contribute to the robustness of phyllotaxis by imposing a temporal sequence on organ initiation. Our findings indicate that not one but two distinct hormone-based fields may be required for achieving temporal precision during formation of reiterative structures at the SAM, thus indicating an original mechanism for providing robustness to a dynamic developmental system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available