4.8 Article

Usp16 contributes to somatic stem-cell defects in Down's syndrome

Journal

NATURE
Volume 501, Issue 7467, Pages 380-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12530

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) basic biology award III
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA100225, CA154209]
  3. CIRM bridges fellowship
  4. Fondazione Umberto Veronesi
  5. Breast Cancer Research Program
  6. Department of Defense
  7. The Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF)
  8. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  9. Down Syndrome Research and Treatment Foundation
  10. Fidelity Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Down's syndrome results from full or partial trisomy of chromosome 21. However, the consequences of the underlying gene-dosage imbalance on adult tissues remain poorly understood. Here we show that in Ts65Dn mice, which are trisomic for 132 genes homologous to genes on human chromosome 21, triplication of Usp16 reduces the self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells and the expansion of mammary epithelial cells, neural progenitors and fibroblasts. In addition, Usp16 is associated with decreased ubiquitination of Cdkn2a and accelerated senescence in Ts65Dn fibroblasts. Usp16 can remove ubiquitin from histone H2A on lysine 119, a critical mark for the maintenance of multiple somatic tissues. Downregulation of Usp16, either by mutation of a single normal Usp16 allele or by short interfering RNAs, largely rescues all of these defects. Furthermore, in human tissues overexpression of USP16 reduces the expansion of normal fibroblasts and postnatal neural progenitors, whereas downregulation of USP16 partially rescues the proliferation defects of Down's syndrome fibroblasts. Taken together, these results suggest that USP16 has an important role in antagonizing the self-renewal and/or senescence pathways in Down's syndrome and could serve as an attractive target to ameliorate some of the associated pathologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available