4.8 Article

Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers

Journal

NATURE
Volume 500, Issue 7464, Pages 541-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12506

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Community [HEALTH-F4-2007-201052]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalized Disease Prediction, Prevention and Care (LuCamp)
  3. ANR MicroObes, the Metagenopolis grant [ANR-11-DPBS-0001]
  4. Region Ile de France (CODDIM)
  5. Fondacoeur
  6. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10CC1016517] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-DPBS-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We are facing a global metabolic health crisis provoked by an obesity epidemic. Here we report the human gut microbial composition in a population sample of 123 non-obese and 169 obese Danish individuals. We find two groups of individuals that differ by the number of gut microbial genes and thus gut bacterial richness. They contain known and previously unknown bacterial species at different proportions; individuals with a low bacterial richness (23% of the population) are characterized by more marked overall adiposity, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia and a more pronounced inflammatory phenotype when compared with high bacterial richness individuals. The obese individuals among the lower bacterial richness group also gain more weight over time. Only a few bacterial species are sufficient to distinguish between individuals with high and low bacterial richness, and even between lean and obese participants. Our classifications based on variation in the gut microbiome identify subsets of individuals in the general white adult population who may be at increased risk of progressing to adiposity-associated co-morbidities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available