4.8 Article

Biguanides suppress hepatic glucagon signalling by decreasing production of cyclic AMP

Journal

NATURE
Volume 494, Issue 7436, Pages 256-260

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11808

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1 DK56886, PO1 DK49210, F32 DK079572]
  2. Association pour l'Etude des Diabetes et des Maladies Metaboliques (ALFEDIAM)
  3. Programme National de Recherche sur le Diabete (PNRD)
  4. Institut Benjamin Delessert

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucose production by the liver is essential for providing a substrate for the brain during fasting. The inability of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose output is a major aetiological factor in the hyperglycaemia of type-2 diabetes mellitus and other diseases of insulin resistance(1,2). For fifty years, one of the few classes of therapeutics effective in reducing glucose production has been the biguanides, which include phenformim and metformin, the latter the most frequently prescribed drug for type-2 diabetes(3). Nonetheless, the mechanism of action of biguanides remains imperfectly understood. The suggestion a decade ago that metformin reduces glucose synthesis through activation of the enzyme AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) has recently been challenged by genetic loss-of-function experiments(4). Here we provide a novel mechanism by which metformin antagonizes the action of glucagon, thus reducing fasting glucose levels. In mouse hepatocytes, metformin leads to the accumulation of AMP and related nucleotides, which inhibit adenylate cyclase, reduce levels of cyclic AMP and protein kinase A (PICA) activity, abrogate phosphorylation of critical protein targets of PICA, and block glucagon-dependent glucose output from hepatocytes. These data support a mechanism of action for metformin involving antagonism of glucagon, and suggest an approach for the development of antidiabetic drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available