4.8 Article

Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants

Journal

NATURE
Volume 493, Issue 7431, Pages 216-220

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11690

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  2. NHLBI [RC2 HL-103010, RC2 HL-102923, RC2 HL-102924, RC2 HL-102925, RC2 HL-102926]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishing the age of each mutation segregating in contemporary human populations is important to fully understand our evolutionary history(1,2) and will help to facilitate the development of new approaches for disease-gene discovery(3). Large-scale surveys of human genetic variation have reported signatures of recent explosive population growth(4-6), notable for an excess of rare genetic variants, suggesting that many mutations arose recently. To more quantitatively assess the distribution of mutation ages, we resequenced 15,336 genes in 6,515 individuals of European American and African American ancestry and inferred the age of 1,146,401 autosomal single nucleotide variants (SNVs). We estimate that approximately 73% of all protein-coding SNVs and approximately 86% of SNVs predicted to be deleterious arose in the past 5,000-10,000 years. The average age of deleterious SNVs varied significantly across molecular pathways, and disease genes contained a significantly higher proportion of recently arisen deleterious SNVs than other genes. Furthermore, European Americans had an excess of deleterious variants in essential and Mendelian disease genes compared to African Americans, consistent with weaker purifying selection due to the Out-of-Africa dispersal. Our results better delimit the historical details of human protein-coding variation, show the profound effect of recent human history on the burden of deleterious SNVs segregating in contemporary populations, and provide important practical information that can be used to prioritize variants in disease-gene discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available