4.8 Article

An epigenetic blockade of cognitive functions in the neurodegenerating brain

Journal

NATURE
Volume 483, Issue 7388, Pages 222-U123

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10849

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institution
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse [RO1DA028301]
  3. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [RO1NS078839]
  4. Bard Richmond fellowship
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation
  6. Simons Foundation
  7. Theodor und Ida Herzog-Egli foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive decline is a debilitating feature of most neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system, including Alzheimer's disease(1). The causes leading to such impairment are only poorly understood and effective treatments are slow to emerge(2). Here we show that cognitive capacities in the neurodegenerating brain are constrained by an epigenetic blockade of gene transcription that is potentially reversible. This blockade is mediated by histone deacetylase 2, which is increased by Alzheimer's-disease-related neurotoxic insults in vitro, in two mouse models of neurodegeneration and in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Histone deacetylase 2 associates with and reduces the histone acetylation of genes important for learning and memory, which show a concomitant decrease in expression. Importantly, reversing the build-up of histone deacetylase 2 by short-hairpin-RNA-mediated knockdown unlocks the repression of these genes, reinstates structural and synaptic plasticity, and abolishes neurodegeneration-associated memory impairments. These findings advocate for the development of selective inhibitors of histone deacetylase 2 and suggest that cognitive capacities following neurodegeneration are not entirely lost, but merely impaired by this epigenetic blockade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available