4.8 Article

The diet of Australopithecus sediba

Journal

NATURE
Volume 487, Issue 7405, Pages 90-93

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11185

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. Smithsonian Institution
  3. Institute for Human Evolution of the University of the Witwatersrand
  4. Max Planck Society
  5. US Department of State Fulbright Scholarship Program
  6. Malapa Project
  7. Leakey Foundation
  8. University of Colorado
  9. Palaeontological Scientific Trust, South Africa
  10. South African Department of Science and Technology
  11. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  12. Ray A. Rothrock Fellowship
  13. Texas AM University
  14. Gauteng Provincial Government
  15. South Africa National Research Foundation
  16. University of the Witwatersrand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Specimens of Australopithecus sediba from the site of Malapa, South Africa (dating from approximately 2 million years (Myr) ago)(1) present a mix of primitive and derived traits that align the taxon with other Australopithecus species and with early Homo(2). Although much of the available cranial and postcranial material of Au. sediba has been described(3-6), its feeding ecology has not been investigated. Here we present results from the first extraction of plant phytoliths from dental calculus of an early hominin. We also consider stable carbon isotope and dental microwear texture data for Au. sediba in light of new palaeoenvironmental evidence. The two individuals examined consumed an almost exclusive C-3 diet that probably included harder foods, and both dicotyledons (for example, tree leaves, fruits, wood and bark) and monocotyledons (for example, grasses and sedges). Like Ardipithecus ramidus (approximately 4.4 Myr ago) and modern savanna chimpanzees, Au. sediba consumed C-3 foods in preference to widely available C-4 resources. The inferred consumption of C-3 monocotyledons, and wood or bark, increases the known variety of early hominin foods. The overall dietary pattern of these two individuals contrasts with available data for other hominins in the region and elsewhere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available