4.8 Article

Targeting nuclear RNA for in vivo correction of myotonic dystrophy

Journal

NATURE
Volume 488, Issue 7409, Pages 111-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11362

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AR049077, U54NS48843, AR/NS48143, K08NS064293, U01NS072323]
  2. Saunders Family Neuromuscular Research Fund
  3. Run America
  4. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  5. Uehara Memorial Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) hold promise for gene-specific knockdown in diseases that involve RNA or protein gain-of-function effects. In the hereditary degenerative disease myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), transcripts from the mutant allele contain an expanded CUG repeat(1-3) and are retained in the nucleus(4,5). The mutant RNA exerts a toxic gain-of-function effect(6), making it an appropriate target for therapeutic ASOs. However, despite improvements in ASO chemistry and design, systemic use of ASOs is limited because uptake in many tissues, including skeletal and cardiac muscle, is not sufficient to silence target messenger RNAs7,8. Here we show that nuclear-retained transcripts containing expanded CUG (CUG(exp)) repeats are unusually sensitive to antisense silencing. In a transgenic mouse model of DM1, systemic administration of ASOs caused a rapid knockdown of CUG(exp) RNA in skeletal muscle, correcting the physiological, histopathologic and transcriptomic features of the disease. The effect was sustained for up to 1 year after treatment was discontinued. Systemically administered ASOs were also effective for muscle knockdown of Malat(1), a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) that is retained in the nucleus(9). These results provide a general strategy to correct RNA gain-of-function effects and to modulate the expression of expanded repeats, lncRNAs and other transcripts with prolonged nuclear residence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available