4.8 Article

The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2 in the Hubble Deep Field

Journal

NATURE
Volume 486, Issue 7402, Pages 233-236

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11073

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MPG (Germany)
  2. INSU/CNRS (France)
  3. IGN (Spain)
  4. NASA
  5. DLR [FKZ 50OR1004]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0955300] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Hubble Deep Field provides one of the deepest multiwave-length views of the distant Universe and has led to the detection of thousands of galaxies seen throughout cosmic time(1). An early map of the Hubble Deep Field at a wavelength of 850 micrometres, which is sensitive to dust emission powered by star formation, revealed the brightest source in the field, dubbed HDF 850.1 (ref. 2). For more than a decade, and despite significant efforts, no counterpart was found at shorter wavelengths, and it was not possible to determine its redshift, size or mass(3-7). Here we report a redshift of z = 5.183 for HDF 850.1, from a millimetre-wave molecular line scan. This places HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z approximate to 5.2, corresponding to a cosmic age of only 1.1 billion years after the Big Bang. This redshift is significantly higher than earlier estimates(3,4,6,8) and higher than those of most of the hundreds of submillimetre-bright galaxies identified so far. The source has a star-formation rate of 850 solar masses per year and is spatially resolved on scales of 5 kiloparsecs, with an implied dynamical mass of about 1.3 x 10(11) solar masses, a significant fraction of which is present in the form of molecular gas. Despite our accurate determination of redshift and position, a counterpart emitting starlight remains elusive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available