4.8 Article

Bose glass and Mott glass of quasiparticles in a doped quantum magnet

Journal

NATURE
Volume 489, Issue 7416, Pages 379-384

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11406

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPESP
  2. CNPq
  3. NSF [DMR 0654118, DMR-1006985]
  4. State of Florida
  5. DOE [20100043DR, DE-FG03-01ER45908, DE-FG02-05ER46240]
  6. UEFISCDI [RP-10]
  7. INCITE of the Office of Science, DOE [MAT013]
  8. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1411]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low-temperature states of bosonic fluids exhibit fundamental quantum effects at the macroscopic scale: the best-known examples are Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity, which have been tested experimentally in a variety of different systems. When bosons interact, disorder can destroy condensation, leading to a 'Bose glass'. This phase has been very elusive in experiments owing to the absence of any broken symmetry and to the simultaneous absence of a finite energy gap in the spectrum. Here we report the observation of a Bose glass of field-induced magnetic quasiparticles in a doped quantum magnet (bromine-doped dichloro-tetrakis-thiourea-nickel, DTN). The physics of DTN in a magnetic field is equivalent to that of a lattice gas of bosons in the grand canonical ensemble; bromine doping introduces disorder into the hopping and interaction strength of the bosons, leading to their localization into a Bose glass down to zero field, where it becomes an incompressible Mott glass. The transition from the Bose glass (corresponding to a gapless spin liquid) to the Bose-Einstein condensate (corresponding to a magnetically ordered phase) is marked by a universal exponent that governs the scaling of the critical temperature with the applied field, in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions. Our study represents a quantitative experimental account of the universal features of disordered bosons in the grand canonical ensemble.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available