4.8 Article

A new atmospherically relevant oxidant of sulphur dioxide

Journal

NATURE
Volume 488, Issue 7410, Pages 193-196

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11278

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission Sixth Framework programme project EUCAARI [036833-2]
  2. Academy of Finland [251427, 139656, 141135]
  3. European Research Council (ATMNUCLE)
  4. Kone Foundation
  5. Vaisala Foundation
  6. Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation [2010212]
  7. Otto Malm Foundation
  8. US National Science Foundation
  9. Academy of Finland (AKA) [141135, 251427, 141135, 251427] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric oxidation is a key phenomenon that connects atmospheric chemistry with globally challenging environmental issues, such as climate change(1), stratospheric ozone loss(2), acidification of soils and water(3), and health effects of air quality(4). Ozone, the hydroxyl radical and the nitrate radical are generally considered to be the dominant oxidants that initiate the removal of trace gases, including pollutants, from the atmosphere. Here we present atmospheric observations from a boreal forest region in Finland, supported by laboratory experiments and theoretical considerations, that allow us to identify another compound, probably a stabilized Criegee intermediate (a carbonyl oxide with two free-radical sites) or its derivative, which has a significant capacity to oxidize sulphur dioxide and potentially other trace gases. This compound probably enhances the reactivity of the atmosphere, particularly with regard to the production of sulphuric acid, and consequently atmospheric aerosol formation. Our findings suggest that this new atmospherically relevant oxidation route is important relative to oxidation by the hydroxyl radical, at least at moderate concentrations of that radical. We also find that the oxidation chemistry of this compound seems to be tightly linked to the presence of alkenes of biogenic origin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available