4.8 Article

Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition

Journal

NATURE
Volume 486, Issue 7403, Pages 353-360

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11143

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) [U54 HG003079]
  2. National Cancer Institute [NCI R01 CA095614, NCI U01 CA114722]
  3. Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation [BCTR0707808]
  4. Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation, Inc. [NCI U10 CA076001]
  5. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  6. Novartis
  7. Pfizer
  8. Center grant [NCI P50 CA94056]
  9. NCI core grant [NCI 3P50 CA68438]
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [845783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [845783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To correlate the variable clinical features of oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer with somatic alterations, we studied pretreatment tumour biopsies accrued from patients in two studies of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy by massively parallel sequencing and analysis. Eighteen significantly mutated genes were identified, including five genes (RUNX1, CBFB, MYH9, MLL3 and SF3B1) previously linked to haematopoietic disorders. Mutant MAP3K1 was associated with luminal A status, low-grade histology and low proliferation rates, whereas mutant TP53 was associated with the opposite pattern. Moreover, mutant GATA3 correlated with suppression of proliferation upon aromatase inhibitor treatment. Pathway analysis demonstrated that mutations in MAP2K4, a MAP3K1 substrate, produced similar perturbations as MAP3K1 loss. Distinct phenotypes in oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer are associated with specific patterns of somatic mutations that map into cellular pathways linked to tumour biology, but most recurrent mutations are relatively infrequent. Prospective clinical trials based on these findings will require comprehensive genome sequencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available