4.8 Article

Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks

Journal

NATURE
Volume 473, Issue 7345, Pages 87-U100

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09880

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. European Research Council
  3. European Molecular Biology Organisation
  4. Medical Research Council [243914]
  5. Overseas Research Students Award
  6. UCL
  7. MRC [G0700188] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0700188] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuronal connectivity is fundamental to information processing in the brain. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of sensory processing requires uncovering how connection patterns between neurons relate to their function. On a coarse scale, long-range projections can preferentially link cortical regions with similar responses to sensory stimuli(1-4). But on the local scale, where dendrites and axons overlap substantially, the functional specificity of connections remains unknown. Here we determine synaptic connectivity between nearby layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in vitro, the response properties of which were first characterized in mouse visual cortex in vivo. We found that connection probability was related to the similarity of visually driven neuronal activity. Neurons with the same preference for oriented stimuli connected at twice the rate of neurons with orthogonal orientation preferences. Neurons responding similarly to naturalistic stimuli formed connections at much higher rates than those with uncorrelated responses. Bidirectional synaptic connections were found more frequently between neuronal pairs with strongly correlated visual responses. Our results reveal the degree of functional specificity of local synaptic connections in the visual cortex, and point to the existence of fine-scale subnetworks dedicated to processing related sensory information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available