4.8 Article

Somatic retrotransposition alters the genetic landscape of the human brain

Journal

NATURE
Volume 479, Issue 7374, Pages 534-537

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10531

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [090385/Z/09/Z]
  2. Institute Strategic Programme Grant
  3. British BBSRC [BB/H005935/1]
  4. Australian NHMRC [575585]
  5. Wellcome Trust [090385/Z/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/05191131, BBS/E/D/05191130, BB/H005935/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/05191131, BBS/E/D/05191130, BB/H005935/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that use a germline 'copy-and-paste' mechanism to spread throughout metazoan genomes(1). At least 50 per cent of the human genome is derived from retrotransposons, with three active families (L1, Alu and SVA) associated with insertional mutagenesis and disease(2,3). Epigenetic and post-transcriptional suppression block retrotransposition in somatic cells(4,5), excluding early embryo development and some malignancies(6,7). Recent reports of L1 expression(8,9) and copy number variation(10,11) in the human brain suggest that L1 mobilization may also occur during later development. However, the corresponding integration sites have not been mapped. Here we apply a high-throughput method to identify numerous L1, Alu and SVA germline mutations, as well as 7,743 putative somatic L1 insertions, in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus of three individuals. Surprisingly, we also found 13,692 somatic Alu insertions and 1,350 SVA insertions. Our results demonstrate that retrotransposons mobilize to protein-coding genes differentially expressed and active in the brain. Thus, somatic genome mosaicism driven by retrotransposition may reshape the genetic circuitry that underpins normal and abnormal neurobiological processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available