4.8 Article

The unusual γ-ray burst GRB 101225A from a helium star/neutron star merger at redshift 0.33

Journal

NATURE
Volume 480, Issue 7375, Pages 72-74

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10611

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DNRF
  2. UK Space Agency
  3. MICINN
  4. ERC
  5. DFG
  6. CRI/NRF/MEST of Korea
  7. Russian government
  8. STFC [ST/G009465/1, ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00260X/1, ST/G009465/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most dramatic examples of massive stellar deaths, often associated with supernovae(1). They release ultra-relativistic jets, which produce non-thermal emission through synchrotron radiation as they interact with the surrounding medium(2). Here we report observations of the unusual GRB 101225A. Its gamma-ray emission was exceptionally long-lived and was followed by a bright X-ray transient with a hot thermal component and an unusual optical counterpart. During the first 10 days, the optical emission evolved as an expanding, cooling black body, after which an additional component, consistent with a faint supernova, emerged. We estimate its redshift to be z = 0.33 by fitting the spectral-energy distribution and light curve of the optical emission with a GRB-supernova template. Deep optical observations may have revealed a faint, unresolved host galaxy. Our proposed progenitor is a merger of a helium star with a neutron star that underwent a common envelope phase, expelling its hydrogen envelope. The resulting explosion created a GRB-like jet which became thermalized by interacting with the dense, previously ejected material, thus creating the observed black body, until finally the emission from the supernova dominated. An alternative explanation is a minor body falling onto a neutron star in the Galaxy(3).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available