4.8 Article

Reduced methane growth rate explained by decreased Northern Hemisphere microbial sources

Journal

NATURE
Volume 476, Issue 7359, Pages 194-197

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10259

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NGT5-30409, NNX08AF64G]
  2. NSF [ATM 9871077, ATM-0628637, AGS-1021776]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1021613] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric methane(CH4) increased through much of the twentieth century, but this trend gradually weakened until a stable state was temporarily reached around the turn of the millennium(1,2), after which levels increased once more(3). The reasons for the slowdown are incompletely understood, with past work identifying changes in fossil fuel, wetland and agricultural sources and hydroxyl (OH) sinks as important causal factors(1,4-8). Here we show that the late-twentieth century changes in the CH4 growth rates are best explained by reduced microbial sources in the Northern Hemisphere. Our results, based on synchronous time series of atmospheric CH4 mixing and C-13/C-12 ratios and a two-box atmospheric model, indicate that the evolution of the mixing ratio requires no significant change in Southern Hemisphere sources between 1984 and 2005. Observed changes in the interhemispheric difference of C-13 effectively exclude reduced fossil fuel emissions as the primary cause of the slowdown. The C-13 observations are consistent with long-term reductions in agricultural emissions or another microbial source within the Northern Hemisphere. Approximately half (51 +/- 18%) of the decrease in Northern Hemisphere CH4 emissions can be explained by reduced emissions from rice agriculture in Asia over the past three decades associated with increases in fertilizer application(9) and reductions in water use(10,11).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available