4.8 Article

The braincase and jaws of a Devonian 'acanthodian' and modern gnathostome origins

Journal

NATURE
Volume 457, Issue 7227, Pages 305-308

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07436

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern gnathostomes ( jawed vertebrates) emerged in the early Palaeozoic era(1), but this event remains unclear owing to a scant early fossil record. The exclusively Palaeozoic 'acanthodians' are possibly the earliest(2,3) gnathostome group and exhibit amosaic of shark- and bony fish- like characters that has long given them prominence in discussions of early gnathostome evolution(1). Their relationships with modern gnathostomes have remained mysterious, partly because their un- mineralized endoskeletons rarely fossilized. Here I present the first- known braincase of an Early Devonian (approximately 418-412 Myr BP) acanthodian, Ptomacanthus anglicus(4), and re- evaluate the interrelationships of basal gnathostomes. Acanthodian braincases have previously been represented by a single genus, Acanthodes(5), which occurs more than 100 million years later in the fossil record. The braincase of Ptomacanthus differs radically from the osteichthyan- like braincase of Acanthodes(5) in exhibiting several plesiomorphic features shared with placoderms(6,7) and some early chondrichthyans(8,9). Most striking is its extremely short sphenoid region and its jaw suspension, which displays features intermediate between some Palaeozoic chondrichthyans and osteichthyans. Phylogenetic analysis resolves Ptomacanthus as either the most basal chondrichthyan or as the sister group of all living gnathostomes. These new data alter earlier conceptions of basal gnathostome phylogeny and thus help to provide a more detailed picture of the acquisition of early gnathostome characters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available