4.8 Article

Holocene thinning of the Greenland ice sheet

Journal

NATURE
Volume 461, Issue 7262, Pages 385-388

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/nature08355

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Carlsberg Foundation
  2. Groupement de Recherche Europeen (GDRE) Vostok (Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU)/Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR)-CNRS [05-05-66801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On entering an era of global warming, the stability of the Greenland ice sheet (GIS) is an important concern(1), especially in the light of new evidence of rapidly changing flow and melt conditions at the GIS margins(2). Studying the response of the GIS to past climatic change may help to advance our understanding of GIS dynamics. The previous interpretation of evidence from stable isotopes (delta O-18) in water from GIS ice cores was that Holocene climate variability on the GIS differed spatially(3) and that a consistent Holocene climate optimum-the unusually warm period from about 9,000 to 6,000 years ago found in many northern-latitude palaeoclimate records(4)-did not exist. Here we extract both the Greenland Holocene temperature history and the evolution of GIS surface elevation at four GIS locations. We achieve this by comparing delta O-18 from GIS ice cores(3,5) with delta O-18 from ice cores from small marginal icecaps. Contrary to the earlier interpretation of delta O-18 evidence from ice cores(3,6), our new temperature history reveals a pronounced Holocene climatic optimum in Greenland coinciding with maximum thinning near the GIS margins. Our delta O-18-based results are corroborated by the air content of ice cores, a proxy for surface elevation(7). State-of-the-art ice sheet models are generally found to be underestimating the extent and changes in GIS elevation and area; our findings may help to improve the ability of models to reproduce the GIS response to Holocene climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available