4.8 Article

Selective oxidation with dioxygen by gold nanoparticle catalysts derived from 55-atom clusters

Journal

NATURE
Volume 454, Issue 7207, Pages 981-U31

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07194

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. King's College, Cambridge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supported gold nanoparticles have excited much interest owing to their unusual and somewhat unexpected catalytic properties(1-7), but the origin of the catalytic activity is still not fully understood. Experimental work(4) on gold particles supported on a titanium dioxide ( 110) single- crystal surface has established a striking size threshold effect associated with a metal- to- insulator transition, with gold particles catalytically active only if their diameters fall below similar to 3.5 nm. However, the remarkable catalytic behaviour might also in part arise from strong electronic interaction between the gold and the titanium dioxide support(2,3,5). In the case of industrially important selective oxidation reactions, explanation of the effectiveness of gold nanoparticle catalysts is complicated by the need for additives to drive the reaction(5,7,8), and/or the presence of strong support interactions and incomplete understanding of their possible catalytic role(1-3,5). Here we show that very small gold entities (similar to 1.4 nm) derived from 55- atom gold clusters and supported on inert materials are efficient and robust catalysts for the selective oxidation of styrene by dioxygen. We find a sharp size threshold in catalytic activity, in that particles with diameters of similar to 2 nm and above are completely inactive. Our observations suggest that catalytic activity arises from the altered electronic structure intrinsic to small gold nanoparticles, and that the use of 55- atom gold clusters may prove a viable route to the synthesis of robust gold catalysts suited to practical application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available