4.8 Article

Structural basis of microtubule severing by the hereditary spastic paraplegia protein spastin

Journal

NATURE
Volume 451, Issue 7176, Pages 363-U16

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature06482

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [K99 NS057934-02, K99 NS057934-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spastin, the most common locus for mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegias(1), and katanin are related microtubule- severing AAA ATPases(2-6) involved in constructing neuronal(7-10) and non-centrosomal(7,11) microtubule arrays and in segregating chromosomes(12,13). The mechanism by which spastin and katanin break and destabilize microtubules is unknown, in part owing to the lack of structural information on these enzymes. Here we report the X- ray crystal structure of the Drosophila spastin AAA domain and provide a model for the active spastin hexamer generated using small- angle X- ray scattering combined with atomic docking. The spastin hexamer forms a ring with a prominent central pore and six radiating arms that may dock onto the microtubule. Helices unique to the microtubule- severing AAA ATPases surround the entrances to the pore on either side of the ring, and three highly conserved loops line the pore lumen. Mutagenesis reveals essential roles for these structural elements in the severing reaction. Peptide and antibody inhibition experiments further show that spastin may dismantle microtubules by recognizing specific features in the carboxy- terminal tail of tubulin. Collectively, our data support a model in which spastin pulls the C terminus of tubulin through its central pore, generating a mechanical force that destabilizes tubulin- tubulin interactions within the microtubule lattice. Our work also provides insights into the structural defects in spastin that arise from mutations identified in hereditary spastic paraplegia patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available