Journal
NATURE
Volume 454, Issue 7208, Pages 1137-U69Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07066
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIH [R01CA85619, R01HD042619, R01CA121275, R01HD047470, P01CA097189, K01CA102328]
- DoD awards [BC0300893, BC061730]
- T32 fellowship [CA106196]
- Pew Charitable Trusts Scholar Award
- Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The E2F family is conserved from Caenorhabditis elegans to mammals, with some family members having transcription activation functions and others having repressor functions(1,2). Whereas C. elegans(3) and Drosophila melanogaster(4,5) have a single E2F activator protein and repressor protein, mammals have at least three activator and five repressor proteins(1,2,6). Why such genetic complexity evolved in mammals is not known. To begin to evaluate this genetic complexity, we targeted the inactivation of the entire subset of activators, E2f1, E2f2, E2f3a and E2f3b, singly or in combination in mice. We demonstrate that E2f3a is sufficient to support mouse embryonic and postnatal development. Remarkably, expression of E2f3b or E2f1 from the E2f3a locus ( E2f3a(3bki) or E2f3a(1ki), respectively) suppressed all the postnatal phenotypes associated with the inactivation of E2f3a. We conclude that there is significant functional redundancy among activators and that the specific requirement for E2f3a during postnatal development is dictated by regulatory sequences governing its selective spatiotemporal expression and not by its intrinsic protein functions. These findings provide a molecular basis for the observed specificity among E2F activators during development.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available