4.8 Article

Super-chondritic Sm/Nd ratios in Mars, the Earth and the Moon

Journal

NATURE
Volume 452, Issue 7185, Pages 336-339

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature06760

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D001250/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/D001250/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small isotopic differences in the atomic abundance of neodymium-142 (Nd-142) in silicate rocks represent the time- averaged effect of decay of formerly live samarium- 146 (Sm-146) and provide constraints on the timescales and mechanisms by which planetary mantles first differentiated(1-4). This chronology, however, assumes that the composition of the total planet is identical to that of primitive undifferentiated meteorites called chondrites. The difference in the Nd-142/Nd-144 ratio between chondrites and terrestrial samples may therefore indicate very early isolation (<30Myr from the formation of the Solar System) of the upper mantle or a slightly non- chondritic bulk Earth composition(5,6). Here we present high-precision Nd-142 data for 16 martian meteorites and show that Mars also has a non- chondritic composition. Meteorites belonging to the shergottite subgroup define a planetary isochron yielding an age of differentiation of 40 +/- 18 Myr for the martian mantle. This isochron does not pass through the chondritic reference value ( 100 x epsilon Nd-142 = -21 +/- 3; Sm-147/Nd-144 = 0.1966)(6). The Earth, Moon and Mars all seem to have accreted in a portion of the inner Solar System with similar to 5 per cent higher Sm/Nd ratios than material accreted in the asteroid belt. Such chemical heterogeneities may have arisen from sorting of nebular solids or from impact erosion of crustal reservoirs in planetary precursors. The Nd-143 composition of the primitive mantle so defined by Nd-142 is strikingly similar to the putative endmember component 'FOZO' characterized by high He-3/He-4 ratios(7,8).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available