4.8 Article

Total synthesis of bryostatin 16 using atom-economical and chemoselective approaches

Journal

NATURE
Volume 456, Issue 7221, Pages 485-488

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07543

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM 13598]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Of the concepts used to improve the efficiency of organic syntheses, two have been especially effective: atom economy(1) ( the use of routes in which most of the atoms present in the reactants also end up in the product) and chemoselectivity(2) ( the use of reactions that take place only at desired positions in a molecule). Synthesis of complex natural products is the most demanding arena in which to explore such principles. The bryostatin family of compounds are especially interesting targets, because they combine structural complexity with promising biological activity(3-7). Furthermore, synthetic routes to some bryostatins have already been reported(9-12), providing a benchmark against which new syntheses can be measured. Here we report a concise total synthesis of bryostatin 16 ( 1), a parent structure from which almost all other bryostatins could in principle be accessed. Application of atom-economical and chemoselective reactions currently under development provides ready access to polyhydropyran motifs in the molecule, which are common structural features of many other natural products. The most notable transformations are two transition-metal- catalysed reactions. The first is a palladium- catalysed reaction of two different alkynes to form a large ring. The product of this step is then converted into a dihydropyran ( the 'C ring' of bryostatins) in the second key reaction, which is catalysed by a gold compound. Analogues of bryostatin that do not exist in nature could be readily made by following this route, which might allow the biological activity of bryostatins to be fine- tuned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available