4.8 Article

Crystallographic preferred orientation of akimotoite and seismic anisotropy of Tonga slab

Journal

NATURE
Volume 455, Issue 7213, Pages 657-660

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sport, and Technology of the Japanese Government.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mineral akimotoite, ilmenite- structured MgSiO3, exists at the bottom of the Earth's mantle transition zone and within the uppermost lower mantle, especially under low- temperature conditions(1). Akimotoite is thought to be a major constituent of the harzburgite layer of subducting slabs, and the most anisotropic mineral in the mantle transition zone(2-4). It has been predicted that if akimotoite crystals are preferentially oriented by plastic deformation, a cold subducted slab would be extremely anisotropic(5). However, there have been no studies of crystallographic preferred orientations and very few reports of plastic deformation experiments for MgSiO3 ilmenite. Here we present plastic deformation experiments on polycrystalline akimotoite, which were conducted at confining pressures of 20-22 GPa and temperatures of 1,000-1,300 degrees C. We found a change in crystallographic preferred orientation pattern of akimotoite with temperature, where the c-axis maximum parallel to the compression direction develops at high temperature, whereas the c axes are preferentially oriented parallel to the shear direction or perpendicular to the compression direction at lower temperature. The previously reported difference in compressional- wave seismic anisotropy between the northern and southern segments of the Tonga slab at depths of the mantle transition zone(6) can conceivably be attributed to the difference in the crystallographic preferred orientation pattern of akimotoite at varying temperature within the slab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available