4.8 Article

Molecular basis of xeroderma pigmentosum group C DNA recognition by engineered meganucleases

Journal

NATURE
Volume 456, Issue 7218, Pages 107-U8

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature07343

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU MEGATOOL [LSHG-CT-2006-037226]
  2. CRG-Novartis fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Xeroderma pigmentosum is a monogenic disease characterized by hypersensitivity to ultraviolet light. The cells of xeroderma pigmentosum patients are defective in nucleotide excision repair, limiting their capacity to eliminate ultraviolet- induced DNA damage, and resulting in a strong predisposition to develop skin cancers(1). The use of rare cutting DNA endonucleases - such as homing endonucleases, also known as meganucleases - constitutes one possible strategy for repairing DNA lesions. Homing endonucleases have emerged as highly specific molecular scalpels that recognize and cleave DNA sites, promoting efficient homologous gene targeting through double- strand- break- induced homologous recombination. Here we describe two engineered heterodimeric derivatives of the homing endonuclease I- CreI, produced by a semi- rational approach. These two molecules - Amel3 - Amel4 and Ini3 - Ini4 cleave DNA from the human XPC gene ( xeroderma pigmentosum group C), in vitro and in vivo. Crystal structures of the I- CreI variants complexed with intact and cleaved XPC target DNA suggest that the mechanism of DNA recognition and cleavage by the engineered homing endonucleases is similar to that of the wild- type I- CreI. Furthermore, these derivatives induced high levels of specific gene targeting in mammalian cells while displaying no obvious genotoxicity. Thus, homing endonucleases can be designed to recognize and cleave the DNA sequences of specific genes, opening up new possibilities for genome engineering and gene therapy in xeroderma pigmentosum patients whose illness can be treated ex vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available