4.4 Article

Effects of tetrandrine on cAMP and cGMP levels in rabbit corpus cavernosum in vitro

Journal

NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 1095-1103

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786410802433971

Keywords

tetrandrine; cyclic adenosine monophosphate; cyclic guanosine monophosphate; rabbit corpus cavernosum

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30471736]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to further investigate the relaxation mechanism of tetrandrine (Tet), a bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloid isolated from the Chinese medicinal herb-root of Stephania tetrandra S Moore, on rabbit corpus cavernosum tissue in vitro. The effects of Tet on the concentrations of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in isolated and incubated rabbit corpus cavernosum tissue were recorded by means of 125I radioimmunoassay. The basal concentration of cAMP in corpus cavernosum tissue was 5.67 +/- 0.97 pmol mg-1. Tet increased the cAMP concentration in a dose-dependent manner (p 0.05), but this effect was not inhibited by an adenylate cyclase inhibitor (cis-N-(2-phenylcyclopentyl)azacyclotridec-1-en-2-amine, MDL-12, 330A) (p 0.05). The accumulation of cAMP induced by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1, a stimulator of cAMP production) was also augmented by Tet in a dose-dependent manner (p 0.05). The basal concentration of cGMP in corpus cavernosum tissue is 0.44 +/- 0.09 pmol mg-1. Tet did not affect this concentration of cGMP, neither in the presence nor the absence of a guanyl cyclase inhibitor (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one, ODQ) (p 0.05). Further, sodium nitroprusside (SNP, a stimulator of cGMP production)-induced cGMP production was not enhanced by Tet (p 0.05). Tet, with its relaxation mechanism, can enhance the concentration of cAMP in rabbit corpus cavernosum tissue, probably by inhibiting PDEs activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available