4.6 Article

Modelling glacial lake outburst flood impacts in the Bolivian Andes

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 1415-1438

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-018-3486-6

Keywords

Bolivian Andes; Geohazards; Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs); Hydrodynamic modelling; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. Environmental Science Research Centre studentship at Manchester Metropolitan University
  2. British Society for Geomorphology
  3. University of Manchester
  4. European Space Agency [32966]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Bolivian Andes have experienced sustained and widespread glacier mass loss in recent decades. Glacier recession has been accompanied by the development of proglacial lakes, which pose a glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) risk to downstream communities and infrastructure. Previous research has identified three potentially dangerous glacial lakes in the Bolivian Andes, but no attempt has yet been made to model GLOF inundation downstream from these lakes. We generated 2-m resolution DEMs from stereo and tri-stereo SPOT 6/7 satellite images to drive a hydrodynamic model of GLOF flow (HEC-RAS 5.0.3). The model was tested against field observations of a 2009 GLOF from Keara, in the Cordillera Apolobamba, and was shown to reproduce realistic flood depths and inundation. The model was then used to model GLOFs from Pelechuco lake (Cordillera Apolobamba) and Laguna Arkhata and Laguna Glaciar (Cordillera Real). In total, six villages could be affected by GLOFs if all three lakes burst. For sensitivity analysis, we ran the model for three scenarios (pessimistic, intermediate, optimistic), which give a range of similar to 1100 to similar to 2200 people affected by flooding; between similar to 800 and similar to 2100 people could be exposed to floods with a flow depth 2m, which could be life threatening and cause a significant damage to infrastructure. We suggest that Laguna Arkhata and Pelechuco lake represent the greatest risk due to the higher numbers of people who live in the potential flow paths, and hence, these two glacial lakes should be a priority for risk managers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available